<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Flex on Red Leopard</title>
    <link>https://www.redleopard.com/tags/flex/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Flex on Red Leopard</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.redleopard.com/tags/flex/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Actionscript GZIP Alternative</title>
      <link>https://www.redleopard.com/2008/12/actionscript-gzip-alternative/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.redleopard.com/2008/12/actionscript-gzip-alternative/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I really wish Actionscript 3 had a native decompression utility for opening GZIP compressed files. I really do. After reading (and trying to implement the advice of) numerous postings, I gave up on GZIP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my investigation, I walked byte-by-byte through numerous binary dumps. Somewhere along the way I noticed a pattern. Forget about the head and foot bytes, the basic GZIP compressed data is simply not the same as the actionscript base deflate-algorithm compressed data.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Flexible Web Services</title>
      <link>https://www.redleopard.com/2008/09/flexible-web-services/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.redleopard.com/2008/09/flexible-web-services/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Things don’t change. You change your way of looking, that’s all.&lt;br&gt;
— Carlos Castañeda&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Early this spring, I made some big architectural changes in the company’s &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.sonicswap.com&#34;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;. The two most far-reaching changes involved Amazon’s Web Services and Adobe’s Flex product. Sometimes you regret big changes. I only regret having not made the changes earlier.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I admit that I wasn’t always a flex fan. Indeed, I dismissed the flex out of hand in the early days mainly as a response to Macromedia’s steep pricing model. Ouch. Since then, Adobe had bought Macromedia and the pricing model changed several times. I never noticed. Such is the cost of writing something off.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
