<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ec2 on Red Leopard</title>
    <link>https://www.redleopard.com/tags/ec2/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ec2 on Red Leopard</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:09:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.redleopard.com/tags/ec2/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>EC2 and S3 Success Story</title>
      <link>https://www.redleopard.com/2008/12/ec2-and-s3-success-story/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.redleopard.com/2008/12/ec2-and-s3-success-story/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been building systems lately on Amazon’s &lt;a href=&#34;http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/&#34;&gt;Elastic Compute Cloud&lt;/a&gt; (EC2). At first, I was only interested in Amazon’s &lt;a href=&#34;http://aws.amazon.com/s3/&#34;&gt;Simple Storage Solution&lt;/a&gt; (S3) after seeing the SmugMug &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.slideshare.net/techdude/scalability-set-amazons-servers-on-fire-not-yours/&#34;&gt;slide show&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hadn’t really considered using EC2 since we had more servers in colocation than I really needed. But I had a file storage problem. When you have a thousand files, you stick them in a directory. When you have a million files, you cannot simply stick them in a single directory. You distribute them across multiple directories. What a PITA.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
