<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Book on Red Leopard</title>
    <link>https://www.redleopard.com/tags/book/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Book on Red Leopard</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:12:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.redleopard.com/tags/book/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Coaching: Evoking Excellence in Others</title>
      <link>https://www.redleopard.com/?p=1237/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.redleopard.com/?p=1237/</guid>
      <description>&lt;div style=&#34;background-color: #f6f6f6; margin-bottom: 2ex;&#34;&gt;
  [&lt;strong&gt;update 2011-05-06&lt;/strong&gt; I believe my tone in this posting is unjustly harsh and debated (with myself) whether to remove it or not. I&amp;#8217;ve decided to let it remain and write a new, more appropriately toned post. Why the change in heart? I&amp;#8217;m reading Sieler&amp;#8217;s &lt;em&gt;Coaching to the Human Soul&lt;/em&gt; (2005). My questions arising in Flaherty&amp;#8217;s (2010) book are being answered in Sieler&amp;#8217;s. I&amp;#8217;ve also just finished reading Brock&amp;#8217;s dissertation (2008) which addresses the history and lineage of coaching. Brock is said to publish &lt;em&gt;Sourcebook of Coaching History&lt;/em&gt; later this year, now on my future reading list.]
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img loading=&#34;lazy&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34; style=&#34;float: left; margin: 0 0.5em 0.5ex 0;&#34; src=&#34; http://www.redleopard.com/images/coaching-envoking-excellence-in-others.jpg&#34; alt=&#34;Book Cover, Coaching: Envoking Excellence in Others by James Flaherty&#34; width=&#34;120&#34; height=&#34;181&#34; /&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;Coaching: Evoking Excellence in Others&lt;br&gt;
by James Flagherty&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beginning Rails 3</title>
      <link>https://www.redleopard.com/2011/03/beginning-rails-3/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 20:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.redleopard.com/2011/03/beginning-rails-3/</guid>
      <description>&lt;img loading=&#34;lazy&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34; width=&#34;145&#34; height=&#34;182&#34; alt=&#34;Book Cover, Beginning Rails 3 by Cloves Carneiro Jr. and Rida Al Barazi&#34; style=&#34;float: left; margin: 0 0.5em 0.5ex 0;&#34; src=&#34; http://www.redleopard.com/images/beginning-rails-3.gif&#34; /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I read a paper some time ago–but for the life of me cannot remember where–presenting study findings on student recall and comprehension. The irony of not recalling the details of a paper on the subject of recall spurred me to examine my own recall in other areas. I may have forgotten the source but the &lt;em&gt;gist&lt;/em&gt; of the paper… &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; I remember: The best way to improve comprehension and recall is to write an essay. I’ve long believed that writing develops a concept more fully (Galbraith, Torrance &amp;amp; Hallam, 2006) but the &lt;em&gt;lost paper&lt;/em&gt; suggests that essay writing on a new subject internalizes the content.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I’m Sure</title>
      <link>https://www.redleopard.com/2006/11/im-sure/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.redleopard.com/2006/11/im-sure/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I travel. A lot. Not as much as I used to but it’s still a bit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I travel, I take a stack of unread books. The stack I bring is always one or two books more than I believe I’ll finish. For example, my last trip to Delhi lasted two weeks. The reading list for that tripâ¦&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Talent</title>
      <link>https://www.redleopard.com/2006/09/talent/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.redleopard.com/2006/09/talent/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Peters, Tom. &lt;em&gt;Talent: Develop it, Sell it, Be it&lt;/em&gt;. London: Dorling Kindersley Limited, 2005.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I picked &lt;em&gt;Talent&lt;/em&gt; up in the &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.hongkongairport.com/&#34; title=&#34;Hong Kong International Airport&#34;&gt;Hong Kong airport&lt;/a&gt; last month. I thought I would read it on the flight to Delhi but found the format too annoying. The colored text on colored pages was simply too trying.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Book: Battle for the Mind</title>
      <link>https://www.redleopard.com/2003/11/book-battle-for-the-mind/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.redleopard.com/2003/11/book-battle-for-the-mind/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I read a fair amount. I wouldn’t say a lot only because I don’t really read that fast. Well, that’s not true. Fictional and biographical works I cruise through fairly quickly. It’s non-fiction that slows me to a crawl.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was a decade ago that I realized the obvious. Just because you start reading a book doesn’t mean you have to finish it. I can still remember the book that broke the spell: &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.redleopard.com/text/bibliographies/0930031199.txt&#34;&gt;The Vermont Papers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I’m reading a book for my own enjoyment and edification, if I can’t relate the book to my life, if I’m getting nothing out of the book, it’s history. Ciao, baby. The Vermont Papers was my last &amp;ldquo;I’ll finish the book simply because I started it&amp;rdquo; experience. When I finished that book, I said, &amp;ldquo;What a waste of my time.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, I’m reading &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.redleopard.com/text/bibliographies/1883536065.txt&#34;&gt;Battle for the Mind&lt;/a&gt;. This book I will finish and read again.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
